The lawsuit alleged that the chat service was defective and falsely represented.
230(c)(1) (Section 230), which was granted by the court.
Judge Michael Mosman determined that, unlike many Section 230 cases, the lawsuit,A.M.
v. Omegle, specifically targeted Omelges design of the platform rather than the content on the site.
In his ruling, Mosman also quotesLemmon v. Snap, a case with similar foundations to Omegles.
v. Omegle,hasnt been concluded yet.
Also Read-Best Omegle Alternatives
Read More
source: www.techworm.net
